GitHub: Cloning MIFARE Classic
Legal Disclaimer:
This guide is intended solely for educational purposes and for use in authorized security testing. Any unauthorized use, cloning, or tampering with RFID systems is illegal and unethical. Always obtain proper authorization before performing any penetration tests.
In today's threat landscape, legacy RFID systems, particularly the MIFARE Classic 1K, continue to remain prevelant despite decades of known vulnerabilities. This guide distills both theoretical and hands-on expertise into a technical walkthrough for extracting authentication keys and either emulating or cloning these cards. It covers historical context, inherent vulnerabilities, advanced attack methodologies, and defensive mitigations.
Note: MIFARE Classic 1K cards operate at 13.56 MHz
This guide provides a comprehensive overview of techniques for cloning MIFARE Classic 1K cards, a legacy RFID technology still widely deployed despite its vulnerabilities. It details the process of extracting authentication keys and emulating or cloning the card using tools like the Flipper Zero and custom firmware. Additionally, it discusses alternative tools such as the Proxmark3 for handling specific scenarios (e.g., “Static Encrypted” cards), outlines multiple attack methodologies, and recommends robust mitigation strategies.
Key Highlights:
Background & Vulnerabilities:
MIFARE Classic 1K cards, structured into 16 sectors and operating at 13.56 MHz, utilize the proprietary CRYPTO1 algorithm. Its limited key space and predictable challenge-response mechanism, combined with the frequent use of default keys and fixed UIDs, have led to the emergence of UID changeable “magic” cards.
Attack Techniques:
The guide explores several advanced attack methodologies:
Emulation & Cloning:
Once all sector keys are recovered, the guide explains how to emulate the card using the Flipper Zero or clone its data onto a physical “magic” card. It also addresses challenges such as timing discrepancies in emulation, recommending firmware updates and other adjustments to resolve these issues.
Mitigation Strategies:
To counter these vulnerabilities, the guide advocates upgrading to modern, cryptographically secure systems, enforcing strong key management, and adopting multi-factor authentication. It further recommends incorporating network segmentation and physical security measures, as well as conducting regular security audits and firmware/software updates.
MIFARE is a series of integrated circuit (IC) chips used in contactless smart cards and proximity cards. The brand includes proprietary solutions based on various levels of the ISO/IEC 14443 Type-A 13.56 MHz contactless smart card standard. It uses AES and DES/Triple-DES encryption standards, as well as an older proprietary encryption algorithm, Crypto-1. According to NXP, 10 billion of their smart card chips and over 150 million reader modules have been sold.
The MIFARE Classic IC is a basic memory storage device, where the memory is divided into segments and blocks with simple security mechanisms for access control. They are ASIC-based and have limited computational power. Due to their reliability and low cost, those cards are widely used for electronic wallets, access control, corporate ID cards, transportation or stadium ticketing. It uses an NXP proprietary security protocol (Crypto-1) for authentication and ciphering.
The MIFARE Classic with 1K memory offers 1,024 bytes of data storage, split into 16 sectors; each sector is protected by two different keys, called A and B. Each key can be programmed to allow operations such as reading, writing, increasing value blocks, etc.
MIFARE Classic 1K cards operate at 13.56 MHz and are divided into 16 sectors, each typically comprising 4 blocks (with block 0 reserved for the immutable Unique Identifier (UID) and manufacturer data). Authentication relies on the proprietary CRYPTO1 algorithm. Over time, extensive research has exposed several weaknesses:
Weak Cryptography:
The CRYPTO1 algorithm’s limited key space makes brute-force, dictionary, and nested attacks feasible.
Default & Reused Keys:
Many deployments still use default keys (e.g., FFFFFFFFFFFF), analogous to default admin credentials, greatly simplifying unauthorized access.
UID Immutability:
Although a fixed UID enhances security by ensuring consistent identity, it complicates cloning, which has led to the development of “magic” or UID changeable cards—often exploiting undocumented backdoors.
Security Controls & Mitigations:
Confirm that the target is a MIFARE Classic 1K (or variant) and gather initial intelligence.
The aim is to recover the secret keys from each sector. Without these keys, the card reader’s authentication handshake will fail, preventing access to the card’s data.
Many cards utilize default or commonly reused keys. A dictionary attack leverages a precompiled list of these keys to authenticate sectors.
When the dictionary attack is only partially successful, the Mfkey32 method captures cryptographic nonces during the reader’s handshake and processes them—often via a combination of statistical and brute-force methods—to deduce additional keys.
Cryptographic Material Exposure:
During the handshake, the reader issues a nonce (a random challenge) to the card. The card’s response, computed using CRYPTO1 and its secret key, may inadvertently leak exploitable intermediate data if the reader's implementation is weak.
Exploiting CRYPTO1 Weaknesses:
The limited key space and predictable challenge-response behavior of CRYPTO1 mean that once nonces are captured, they can be leveraged to reconstruct the secret keys using advanced cryptanalysis.
Randomization Deficiencies:
Poor nonce randomization or predictable patterns reduce the computational effort needed for key recovery.
Session Aggregation:
In cases where the reader reuses certain values or fails to adequately protect intermediate data, cumulative nonces from multiple sessions can eventually reveal the complete key material.
mfkey32v2 from GitHub.A Nested attack takes advantage of partially authenticated sessions and previously obtained keys by leveraging residual nonces from earlier interactions to unlock remaining sectors.
run fm11rf08s_recovery script).Some card manufacturers employ specific key derivation functions (KDFs) that can be exploited via dedicated plugins, allowing for rapid key recovery when vulnerabilities exist.
plugins.zip..fal files and copy them to the SD card directory at /apps_data/nfc/plugins/.Note: If certain keys remain elusive, revert to the Mfkey32 method. Currently, there is no known process to crack the residual keys without further exploiting system vulnerabilities.
After successfully extracting all sector keys, you can proceed to either emulate the card using the Flipper Zero or clone its data onto a physical “magic” card.
Cloning MIFARE Classic 1K cards starkly exposes the vulnerabilities inherent in legacy access control systems. While the techniques described here mirror the current state-of-the-art in penetration testing, they also serve as a call to action for better security measures.
Recommendations:
Ethical Reminder:
This guide is provided for educational purposes and authorized security testing only. Unauthorized cloning or tampering with RFID systems is both illegal and unethical.
By integrating these insights and best practices, security professionals can significantly bolster the resilience of access control systems against modern threats.